Missouri marital assets

Nonmonetary contributions may include activities like the following: Household chores, cooking, homemaking Taking care of children Supporting their spouse professionally One spouse's nonmonetary contributions to the marriage may be seen by the court as grounds for awarding a larger percentage of the marital property. Missouri law allows courts to consider economic misconduct of a spouse as a factor in determining equitable property division.

Economic misconduct generally means dissipation of assets , which is the legal term for the wasting or loss of marital funds or assets by a spouse through means like excessive spending, gambling, fraud, etc. If a spouse is found to have dissipated marital funds in a way that injured the other spouse, the court may take punitive or restorative action by awarding a higher percentage of divided property to the injured spouse. Missouri statute does provide for court consideration of a spouse's contribution to their partner's education during the course of a marriage.

If one spouse supported financially or otherwise the other and enabled them to obtain education or other training that increased their earning power, these contributions can be considered by a Missouri judge when determining how to divide marital property.

A prenuptual agreement , or pre-nup, is a binding legal contract signed by both spouses prior to getting married in Missouri. A prenup containing a property division agreement can take precedence over Missouri's property division laws by establishing what is considered as separate vs marital property, as well as agreeing on how finances will be structured during the marriage and divided in the event of a divorce.

The existance of a valid prenuptual agreement can prevent a Missouri court from having full reign to determine how assets are divided between the spouses, and instead allow them to be divided in a way agreed to by both spouses prior to the event. A Missouri property division order is a court order issued by a court order issued by a judge, describing how property is to be divided between spouses following a divorce.

A property division order is a binding legal obligation, and failure to comply with the terms in full by either spouse can result in being charged with contempt of court. If your spouse is not complying with a property division order, you can consult a family lawyer to discuss potential legal avenues. Read More. We value your feedback!

Do you have a comment or correction concerning this page? Let us know in a single click. We read every comment! Toggle navigation Marital Laws. Complete Calculators. Aaml General Ginsburg.

Community Property? Only Marital Community Property Divided? Statutory List of Factors? Contributions made within a marriage. Such as? Economic Misconduct? Contribution to Education. Does state of Missouri only divide marital property after a divorce?

Is there a set list of statutory factors for determining property division in the state of Missouri? Do courts in the state of Missouri consider nonmonetary contributions? Does Missouri consider a spouse's economic misconduct in property division? Are contributions to education considered in the state of Missouri? Can a pre-nuptual agreement affect property division in Missouri? How can I enforce a property division order in Missouri? Dower and Curtesy in Missouri? The court's order as it affects distribution of marital property shall be a final order not subject to modification; provided, however, that orders intended to be qualified domestic relations orders affecting pension, profit sharing and stock bonus plans pursuant to the U.

A certified copy of any decree of court affecting title to real estate may be filed for record in the office of the recorder of deeds of the county and state in which the real estate is situated by the clerk of the court in which the decree was made. Claunch v. Claunch A. Conrad v. Bowers A. In re Marriage of Vanet A. Butcher v. Butcher A.

Davis A. Thus, in addition to shares in closely held corporation awarded by trial court, she would be awarded a farm acquired by parties during marriage. Marriage of Schulte A. Corder v. Corder A. Held error to set a future date for sale of property and allow a party a dollar value when sold. Inflation could seriously alter the value of the amount received so that proper judgment should have been for a percentage of the sale to be held in the future.

Ortmann v. Ortmann A. Hulsey v. Hulsey, A. A court may in proper circumstances impute an income to a husband according to what he could have earned by the use of his best efforts.

Klinge v. Klinge A. This is true where one spouse has engaged in marital misconduct. Arp v. Arp A. Chenoweth v. Chenoweth A. This theory allows for reimbursement for increase in value of the property. Hoffman v. Hoffman Mo.